Someone please help me understand why just disconnecting the tank to evaporate system line would not vent the tank to atmospheric without drilling holes in the fuel cap !Carbed bikes had no evap system, only tank vent was through cap.
Injected bikes were meant to vent through the evap system, so if you vent the cap the evap line can be sealed at the tank..
You still have a hose to atmos to locate, OEM poor quality and prone to kinking and blocking, a pain to install. and has no baffle.Someone please help me understand why just disconnecting the tank to evaporate system line would not vent the tank to atmospheric without drilling holes in the fuel cap !
All good stuff and thank you Roy … but … I’m an Engineer so here we go …You still have a hose to atmos to locate, OEM poor quality and prone to kinking and blocking, a pain to install. and has no baffle.
Unless you want the vent /OVERFLOW discharging fuel over the engine and electric, which some might consider undesirable.
Vent in cap has a labrinth to help return a little neat fuel, is quick and easy to do, removes the troublesome vent hose under the tank, and is the way the factory do it!
And you don't have to drill holes, just remove a spring and diaphragm.
No, the Ucal float bowl overflow , and bowl bowl drain screw , discharge through a hose connected to the bottom of the bowl which goes to a low point same as the drain from the overflow channel at the tank capAll good stuff and thank you Roy … but … I’m an Engineer so here we go ……The reason for venting the tank is to fit a carb ..which has a float bowl that will vent fuel over the engine / electrics or under the bike if there are any issues with the floats …rare but not that uncommon in my experience of carbs ..? … Would it be true that disconnecting the evaporator at the bash plate would leave a breather in place and with the spring and diaphragm removed would give parallel vents …. .. genuinely interested, not just being Mr. Awkward …
![]()
OK chaps; my bike now starts and runs. I hesitate to say that I fixed it- you know how mysterious things can be. But I can say that after I raised the float in the carb by a fraction of a smidge, things appear to be O.K. Starting, running, that sort of thing.
I read the on-line instructions of a carb conversion marketed by a well-known Enfield business. To my surprise, all that's necessary is to unplug and tape up the electrickery attached to the fuel injection and away you go. They even show you how to disconnect the Malfunction Indicator Light, which remains on otherwise.
The carb cost AUD$56.95 (eBay), $18.23 the air filter (eBay) plus some fuel tube, a filter and a tap from the mower shop.
I used the original fuel pump mounting plate (minus pump); I had to put some spacers behind the r/h cubby hole to prevent the air filter touching it. That's all. All up less than $110.00.
The result so far is a little more grunt when climbing hills/accelerating and so on. I never go flat out, so I can't comment on top speed. No doubt I shall try different jets (currently main 122, pilot 32) in future- any advice would be welcome.
Something is definitely wrong. It should go twice as far on that amount of fuel.Well, well, I have to say that after a few hundred kms, I got fed up with the fact that although the grunt factor increased noticeably, fuel consumption more or less doubled! I went to have lunch with a pal about 110 kms distant, and found I'd used nearly half a tank. So back to the efi. Not defeated, just educated, and perhaps learning to be appreciative of things as they are, not as I wish they were..
That's kind, Roy, but I think I've done enough experimentation! Everyone I've spoken to says, 'Why on earth did you do that?'I have a good 411 factory CV you can have for postage.
Rumer has it that the were the same as fitted to some Bullets.