I've watched the videos and pondered things, trying to come up with an unbiased opinion (for myself; I don't care what anyone else thinks).
I weighed both arguments (the guy on the BRP and Yammienoob). They both make points to consider.
But the one thing I came back to was the basic design of the Janus and how it got that way. It was designed for visual impact, first and foremost. I'm assuming here, so take it for what it is, but just how much R&D do you think went into the Janus frame/geometry? We're talking about a little operation in Indiana that started off in the world of scooters. I suspect there was way more "this frame design looks good" than "let's spend endless hours testing numerous approaches/designs to find the one that handles best". Janus is a cottage industry; they unlikely have much in the way of real R&D like any mass market manufacturer. I'm guessing they built a frame and suspension, tried it awhile, maybe tweaked it a bit, and then made jigs to put it into production. And most of these admittedly wimpy 250cc machines likely don't do much more than go to the coffee shop and back.
There is also the question of the tensile rigidity of the steel they use. A decent amount of frame flex would easily exacerbate the beginnings of a death wobble.
OTOH, as many commenters asked in Yammie's video, have we heard of any other Janus owners experiencing this phenomenon?
I like Doodle the person, and she really works at being a better rider. She's put miles down on a lot of big, heavy machines that her little self struggles with. You'd think a lightweight toy like a Janus would be more easily managed. Doodle has ridden several RE models and never had an issue. But I do also think, having followed her over the years on and off, that she has to work at being a good rider. She's not a natural, and so something more...challenging...to control may have been a contributor.
Lastly, consider the handlebar design on that thing. Those antique style, wrap-back bars provide a much different experience than normal, more straight-across bars. The leverage they provide is very different.
The grooved surface and the transition bump were the instigators, but I am leaning towards the bike's combination of engineering and design (with a form over function directive) was probably the biggest reason that crash occurred.